Today, I had an enlightening discussion with the electrical engineer who provided me with a picture illustrating the specific data requirements for each attribute in the code. It was fascinating to see the updated attribute names and their corresponding data types. For instance, the attribute previously known as "digital" has now been divided into "digital_in" and "digital_out," both represented by Boolean values. This update prompted a significant restructuring of the code, aligning it with a tree-like structure, as we had envisioned. Throughout the day, I embraced the challenge of adapting the code structure to match the engineer's recommendations. It was an intricate process, but I made substantial progress in aligning each attribute with a corresponding class name, utilizing the class input parameter for defining its data type. This approach transformed the code and brought it closer to the envisioned tree-like structure. While making these modifications, I realized that the changes in the code structure would require me to rework the code for each component accordingly. Tomorrow, I plan to delve into understanding the implications of these changes on the component level. However, one aspect that remains elusive to me is comprehending the purpose and functionality of the "nodes" in the code. Although I am aware that they serve to connect the components together, I am uncertain about the specifics of their implementation. In order to gain clarity, I have scheduled a meeting with the electrical engineer to discuss my questions and seek guidance. Reflecting upon the day's progress, I am pleased with the transformation of the code structure.